Retraction for authors of muscle paper who lifted data from their own 18-year-old article
Reblogged from Retraction Watch: For the second time in a week, we've seen a journal retract a paper because it duplicated something in its own archive. Yesterday, it was a case of plagiarism in a plant journal. Today, we find that the Journal of Anatomy has retracted an article it published earlier this year by […]![](http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host%3Dsaccsivdotcom.wordpress.com%26blog%3D27010174%26post%3D22613%26subd%3Dsaccsivdotcom%26ref%3D%26feed%3D1)
Sursa
2013-10-31 16:36:23