Retraction for authors of muscle paper who lifted data from their own 18-year-old article
Reblogged from Retraction Watch: For the second time in a week, we've seen a journal retract a paper because it duplicated something in its own archive. Yesterday, it was a case of plagiarism in a plant journal. Today, we find that the Journal of Anatomy has retracted an article it published earlier this year by […]Sursa
2013-10-31 16:36:23